![WrongScience.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmcjqhRCBPJvSBFHUdYAm6a45nhwiABgSLnqfBN79EdGjP/WrongScience.png) Recently i saw a post for a podcast from a "philosopher" i used to watch/listen to. And it was about how aliens couldn't exist and be visiting us here on Earth. That they couldn't get here because Einstein". I would love to believe that he had some counter-intelligence group slip him some money to discount aliens and UFOs. However, he is just the type of person who thinks they know science (because they are smart and paid attention in science class) I have seen many of this type of person. Who use "science" as an example of why, what they are saying is smart, and you should trust them. These people always repeat the "known" things, the simple phrases that are hammered into them by our indoctrination system. Things like "We can't go faster than the speed of light", "You can't have a free energy device"… and then they repeat the ideas built off of these lies, like, "to visit other stars, we will need to create huge ships where the grandchildren of the people who left will visit the new world." Or that, "an advanced civilization would build a Dyson's sphere so they could absorb all the star's energy." How do you politely tell these people that they are wrong? - - - - - - -

## With just a few "laws" we constructed a world view that is completely wrong. We, humans, always do this. With the Bible, with myths, with celebrity gossip, and with science (fiction). We take some "truth" and then build on top of it. Even if, or maybe, especially if, we only partially know the truth. Like, so much of Christian Dogma is not based on the scriptures, but based on how we interpret what other people have said about the teachings. It is s structure built on top of our understanding based on how we perceive the facts, and then what we think is logical. If you believe there are 7 colors in the rainbow, you might think that this aligns with there being 7 chakras in the body. And then there is all kinds of things you can interpret from your understanding of that number. Now, what happens when many spiritual people talk about there being 10 or 11 colors in the rainbow? What happens to all that structure built on the number seven? Is it all bunk? Well, those who believed it all existed because "7" may find their world crumbling. And, today, we believe that you need a rocket, something that throws material out the back, so that you can go forward. So many people believe that this is THE WAY, and that all future "space flight" will be based on this. And so, people see flying saucers and are perplexed. Some even say that they can't exist because they are not using a force to stay in the air (need a force to counteract gravity. Like a wing moving through the air). So, will you give up your structure of belief when you see new data? Or will you discard the new data, to keep your structure? - - - - - - -

## We have made choices about which way science would go If you had an entire overview of science (the subset of SCIENCE humans believed, and an overview of SCIENCE) you would find mankind's choices on how to fly very, very amusing/interesting. Most of the other advanced civilizations, on Earth, came up with flying via electro-magnetic-aether vibration. Not a wing being moved through the air. In Tibet (before China destroyed it) the monks would get together and levitate stones with sound waves. It was a ritual they did every year. Imagine if you saw this instead of analyzing bird wings. You might think to build a cockpit on top of a rock that was good for levitation. And design a continual levitation device, that wouldn't be much different than a boom-box. AND! If you didn't know, the Wright brothers only beat a French team by a week. And the world completely ignored a guy who made a floating rock airplane design. There is significance that these all came out at the same time. But, we ignore that, and think that it is just the genius of one man. There are many ways to fly, and our science is only a small subset of SCIENCE. And so, now you can see how we have limited ourselves because of the structure we built on top of the fraction of science that we think we know. - - - - - - -

## So much "Science"-fiction Because we believe that the Theory of Relativity applies to all space and space travel, than all the "space ships" we imagine are some kind of world ships, that accelerate to close to the speed of light, and people onboard will grow old and die before they get there. Meaning we need families on board to have children. And we need to have some kind of stuff to continuously throw out the back. (because Newton) Imagine talking to an alien who describes space travel as becoming one with the vibration of a point in the universe, and so, becoming there. As in, you are here, because you are vibrating at the particular frequency of being here. What does that do to our "science"? What about our "science"-fiction? Imagine that free energy is sooooooo easy, that the aliens will be shocked that we haven't discovered it. Because we believed in the "Laws of Thermodynamics" and the Michelson-Morley Experiment we came to the conclusion that free energy cannot exist. But, this is only a limitation imposed by ourselves on our "science". And, all of those computations that a civilization's level is based on how much energy they can create. What happens to those ideas, those structures built on "science" when we comprehend that energy is not limited in that way. That energy is not a limitation for any advanced civilization. As an example, people are finding ways to harness the atmospheric energy. This group of people state that people of old (we still have their buildings) lit and heated their buildings with this energy. There are drawings of cathedrals being lit with lights that seem to emanate from each roof point. Imagine how idiotic the modern scientist will feel after knowing that there was always so much energy available. Why did we bother killing so many whales for lamp oil… - - - - - - -

We will soon know that aliens are here (those who won't believe will shift into another reality, another earth. And, for the most part, they are already there. So, we on this Earth-reality are going to be meeting aliens. We will be shown alien crafts flying around until everyone has become a believer. But, now that we see flying saucers, floating there, in the air, like a brick doesn't, what do we do with dogma we have created around our "science"? The aliens showed up, and they didn't come in "world ships" and fly through space and near light speed for years to get here, so, do we hold onto our "science" and believe that aliens "did do that", despite evidence that they didn't? Or do we throw out part or all of "science" and the structures we built upon it? Well, we are about to find out. - - - - - - -

All images in this post are my own original creations.

Informationwar

@builderofcastles

What "Science" Is Disproven When Aliens Show Up?